Now I'll have to look around and see who you're talking about! I'm horrible remembering nicks, but there is one poster in the MILF category exclusively, who makes post after post of pictures that are, essentially, identical to the one(s) he posted right before it. Same theme, same general look, like he raided some photographer's "casually posed, clothed, woman" archive and he's determined to post the entire thing here.

Sorry, went on a mini-rant, there. I'm sure my posts are not interesting to many, so I probably shouldn't talk.

There is nothing to address. His posts, while not necessarily any one users cup of tea, are (more or less) on topic for the threads posted in and not a violation of the terms of service. If frequent contribution of material one finds to be personally boring, annoying, or otherwise uninteresting were grounds to ban, I would be handing out bans left and right.

Glad to hear that. ;-)

they stay on topic because he is usually the creator. The problem is when you go to the home page looking for something interesting and the majority of the topics are all his, page after page of typical, normal, average guys photos from gay porn sites.
if he could create just one thread to dump all these photos of his "friends" and their average 9 inch dicks, that would be better than spamming the entire home page. By
the way, the typical indicator that your cock is average is if it pushes up against your chin when hard. Or so I hear.

I would invite you to take a look at the first few pages of the Average Cock Size thread and then perhaps the last 6-7 pages. The posts by GraysAnatomy are clearly not in the spirit of the thread, he's been questioned over it and is now wallpapering the thread in an obvious attempt to troll. I've no issue avoiding threads that don't appeal to me and certainly think it would be out of bounds for me to troll those with an interest in any given thread. I'm not sure where his sense of entitlement comes from, but perhaps a gentle reminder that there are plenty of threads for him to post in without purposely hijacking others would be better for all concerned as well as the site as a whole. We're not talking about a one off situation here. There are 58 pages in the thread and while I haven't taken the time to count, he's clearly the predominate poster in a thread that he's clearly abusing. One might say that he's enjoying stuffing it down our collective throats. Thanks for taking the time to read this, would love to hear your thoughts.

Pete

I'm surprised he hasn't showed his face in this thread and took it over with "average cocks" or holding buddies cocks

probably just a matter of time.

This morning like any other morning I look at Topics within the last 24 hours. One was "hard cocks in underwear" another "Cumming". The last two pages on both filled with pics by the same offender and all of the guys appear to be deformed as their cocks are so large. No I'm not jealous. Put them in one post maybe, but not post after post and polluting the thread.

I suspect he's seen this thread and has upped his game.

The problem with a thread like this, is that Gray has 100% seen it and is probably increasing his "game".

1. You are all feeding his ego by complaining about him even if you are too worried to use GreysAnatomy's name.
2. Trolls need feeding and this thread is perfect fodder.
3. He is laughing at you all, as there is not really anything that can be done as this is a site about sex,wanking and male genitalia.

Now I haven't had a problem with little old GreysAnatomy, but then I don't go near threads with regards cock size, holding buddies junk etc. These threads do not interest me as I have zero desire in them.

IF you were to ban him, who would be next??? What would the ruled be when it comes to posting? No dick pics? No big cocks? No pics that show a hint of yellow in the background?

You could all just ignore him, skip his posts, don't reply or quote them. It won't stop him but his voice would be smaller.

That's just my thoughts, I am not hear to inflame or piss anyone off and lets face it the site as fun as it is needs a massive overhaul which would be way to expensive or worst still will lead to a site HEAVY in ad revenue banners.

Someone gets it.

[u][/u][i][/i]

Thanks for your thoughts. Speaking solely for myself, I don't totally disagree, but there are a couple different POVs when it comes to GA. I've tried a couple of times to tactfully ask for a bit or restraint in some of the threads. I'm not looking for him to be banned just asking that he be a good neighbor if you will. IMO specific posts targeting him that don't show the respect that we're asking from him will surely prod him towards "upping his game" as you put it. In fact I PMed a member here to suggest that some of his responses to GA might not be helping the cause, so I get what you're saying, but the existence of this thread shouldn't serve as troll feed. There should be a place for threads like this, there has to be some sort checks and balances, yes? Personally, I have no issues with the threads that he starts or most of his participation here. The shear volume of posting that he does and the single mindedness of the content is one thing, but that's his thing and not against any rules as far as I know. I think some consideration for the other members here isn't a lot to ask for and it's not a matter of banning someone because we may not like what he's doing. We all have general expectations of decency required of us in life. Rather it be at work, at home, in a gym, restaurant...whatever. And in many cases when we step over lines we are asked to check ourselves. Warnings if you will, because of unacceptable behavior. As for banning and who's next...Reasonable people get the opportunity to continue on, those who can't sometimes face consequences. Other than some egregious violation of the terms of service I wouldn't advocate banning anyone. But I would advocate that it is in the best interest in the board as a whole for moderators and administrators to deal with repeat complaints. Thanks again for your thoughts on this. I appreciate the opportunity to explain where I sit with all of this.

Be well, be safe.
Pete

Well put!

.

Indeed. As I do as well.

Agree.