Vintage sex.
. .
Message Boards
Page: of 33 next >
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Mmmmm nice
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Hairstyles and clothing changes but titties and pussies pretty much remain the same.
This pic of a woman getting out some milk has some tits that gave a guy in the 50's a hard on as well as those looking at it now.
https://i.imgur.com/KKwEOJH.jpg[url]http://[/url]
This pic of a woman getting out some milk has some tits that gave a guy in the 50's a hard on as well as those looking at it now.
https://i.imgur.com/KKwEOJH.jpg[url]http://[/url]
Northstar80 said:
Hairstyles and clothing changes but titties and pussies pretty much remain the same.
This pic of a woman getting out some milk has some tits that gave a guy in the 50's a hard on as well as those looking at it now.
https://i.imgur.com/KKwEOJH.jpg[url]http://[/url]
Hairstyles and clothing changes but titties and pussies pretty much remain the same.
This pic of a woman getting out some milk has some tits that gave a guy in the 50's a hard on as well as those looking at it now.
https://i.imgur.com/KKwEOJH.jpg[url]http://[/url]
Agreed.
lovev her torpedo tits and huge areola
I recognize that carton of milk
I notice that girls tits in the 50s and 60s were pointier than girls tits today also girls back then always had a hairy pussy
Posted on 2021-06-10 07:18 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2021-06-10 07:28 PM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2021-06-15 01:30 AM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2023-08-24 01:29 PM. (2 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2021-06-15 10:44 PM. Last edited by VintageAndNatural on 2021-06-15 10:51 PM. (3 edits total)
Sweet!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2021-06-16 12:50 AM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2023-08-24 01:28 PM. (6 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Page: of 33 next >